The Monstrous Truth About Frankenstein

"Thus strangely are our souls constructed, and by such slight ligaments are we bound to prosperity or ruin." —Frankenstein
Most people know the name Frankenstein and recognize the iconic character: large in stature, green skin, large forehead, and pegs in his neck.
But what if I told you that's not who Frankenstein is?
The truth is, Frankenstein is not the hideous green giant but his creator.
The classic tale that has inspired numerous movies and additional spin-off stories is actually very different from the mainstream image of Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein was a fun Gothic tale unlike what I expected or anything I've read before. Here are some notable aspects of the novel:
Brief Synopsis
Frankenstein is a young science student who becomes obsessed
with “bestowing animation upon lifeless matter.” He creates a creature from
human body parts but is horrified by its hideousness. The creature runs away
and learns about humanity in lonely isolation. Afterwards, the monster asks Frankenstein
for a request, or else he will exact revenge on his creator.
Writing Style, Pace, and Structure
This novel is very characteristic
of older writing styles. The sentences are often lengthy, sometimes being four
or more lines long. Also, it’s written in what I would call “high/elevated language,”
meaning that there are lots of “big” words that are strung together. This can
sometimes make the meaning of sentences hard to understand. For the most part,
the book is an easy read once you get into it.
The story itself was very dark
through and through. Victor Frankenstein was constantly ill, it seemed, and
always in torment. His narrative was very sad, and he remained in his own
perpetual hell.
The pacing of the story is a bit slow
in the beginning but picks up after Frankenstein creates the monster and
recovers from his illness. The beginning of the book was challenging to me—mainly
the part where Frankenstein is talking about his interest in science and philosophy.
That part of the story dragged for me. It was full of information about
philosophy and natural science which fascinated Frankenstein but bored me
(it's just not my cup of coffee). I became lost amongst the unfamiliar topic
and elevated language. Even though it's essential information for the novel and
understanding Frankenstein's character, it can stretch out the novel for some.
After the creation of the monster
the story picked up pace. It really was a page-turner; I kept wanting to know
what was going to happen next and was tempted to stay up all night to find out.
Structurally, this book is a frame
narrative—basically it's a story within a story. The narrative starts in the
preface with letters from a Captain Walton to his sister. Within these letters
he recounts Frankenstein's tale (which is where chapter 1 begins). The
middle portion of the book furthers the frame narrative with the Monster's tale
within Frankenstein's.
Characters
There is a common misconception that Frankenstein is the name of the Monster. This is not true. Victor Frankenstein is indeed the mad genius who created the Monster, who is often referred to as a dӕmon by his maker.
Also, the Monster is not as pleasant looking as the green, peg-necked portrayal so commonly used. According to the novel, the Monster is quite grotesque. He is large in stature but with yellow skin and is more hideously deformed than is humanly possible.
Oh, and Igor, the hunchbacked assistant? The Monster's wife with the crazy hairdo? Yeah, they’re not in the original tale at all. Those well-known characters are not part of Mary Shelley's classical story. Instead there are other characters at play—Elizabeth and Henry Clerval being two important ones.
Elizabeth is what is called “the angel of the house.” She is exceedingly beautiful, kind, and wonderful in every way. Everyone loves her, and she is the treasured darling of the family. In the story, she is taken in by the Frankenstein family at a young age and raised as one of their own.
Monsters and Duality
Although there is only one physical monster in the story, there are really two monsters: Frankenstein
and the Monster. They are similar and different in the ways they are monsters,
which can be seen through their separate narratives.
Frankenstein is torn up inside
about what he's done—creating the Monster—and loathes the Monster for what he does
(don't worry I won't spoil anything). Although not physically ugly,
Frankenstein tells about the monster inside him that consumes him when
creating the actual Monster. The very thought of what he has done makes him
despise himself. Naturally when reading this book, you are drawn to feel sorry
for Frankenstein and hope that he can overcome his torment.
However, the Monster's narrative makes you, along with Frankenstein, feel
sorry for the Monster. There is a struggle with the true nature of the Monster
that tugs you in both directions due to the frame of the story. At first, you
feel sorry for the Monster because he is lonely and hates himself because of
his horrific appearance. But through Frankenstein, you also hate the Monster
for what he does and who he chooses to be.
Both ask for sympathy from the reader,
but both prove themselves to be monstrous in nature and repulsive to themselves.
The duality of the two characters also balance them. They oppose each other yet
are the same.
![]() |
| Gene Wilder (Frankenstein) & Peter Boyle (Monster) in the movie Young Frankenstein |
Overall, the novel deals with the impact of what man is capable of doing. Just because you can do something, does it mean you should? Frankenstein deserves to be called a classic piece of literature. It is a great story with well developed characters, action, romance, and the struggle within man to be the light or darkness inside himself.

Comments
Post a Comment